Ben Duiverman, USA, 2014





This is a game self-published by Ben Duiverman, a Dutchman living in the US, in the fall of 2014, and a strong contendant to the title of "the best game of the year 2014" if I were to made such a list (which I will not: unfortunately there are not enough games published each year, and anyway I tend to like them all).




The game comes in a simple white box, with the idea of saving on shipping costs. "Less box, more game", states Ben on his website. For all of us with storage problems, small boxes win some extra points. Inside the box we find a set of cute chipboard squares with which we can build different race courses, plus three longer squares for the special mountain finishes (l'Alpe d'Huez, il Plan di Montecampione and l'Angliru) . We also find 6 teams of 4 racers, a set of 40 cards (many of which are blank) and a 20-sided die and the rules (which can be also downloaded from the games' website).





The mechanics of the game are quite unusual. While it is a dice game, it is not exactly a roll-and-move game. Each road square features a number that represents the degree of difficulty of the terrain, and the rider must throw this number (or higher) to advance to this square. This, as I have written somewhere else, represents cycling better than the usual rule (advancing the number of squares thrown). However, there are not many games that use it. I can only think of  the (much simpler) Pātes Brusson Tour de France game, of which I wrote when I included it in this site: "I may someday try to improve this game, adding more riders per team and trying to find some tactical variations". Well, this is more or less what Ben has done. (For the record, the  Pātes Brusson game does not use dice but chips; however, they are equivalent to a D5).




Of course, the question which arises with these game mechanics is what to do with the unused points. I mean, if your rider faces a succession of squares marked "4" and you roll, say, 16, should you advance 4 squares, or should you simple move to the first one and lose the rest of the roll (or maybe gain some energy points, or some other alternative advantage). In this game, Ben's decision has been to move forward the full four squares. This is an intuitive rule, of course, but one which , IMHO, brings the game closer to the roll-and-move type. However, do not understand this as an objection, but simply as a technical comment.








The game offers the possibility to play one-day races or to play stage races. As is often the case, the rules for keeping the different classifications are not specially original or remarkable, but then again, who needs them to be so? As the games rules say, they make the game more interesting and complicated.







The game features some "events" cards. Every time a rider moves ahead a tile, he must draw one of these cards. Most of the cards are blank, and the rest are mostly bad news (though not all of them are). Cards must always be displayed for all the players to see, their instruction followed at the player's next turn and returned to the bottom of the deck.







If one has to find some objections to the game, they are the usual with self-published games. The first stages of the game design are sound and well thought-of, while the last minute changes are easy to spot. In the case of this game, for instance, there are three coastal tiles with a crosswinds rule that, while interesting, should have been included as an advanced optional rule.

Another objection which is also a common feature in self-published games is promoting the game as "The World's Best Cycling Racing Board Game", as if such thing were possible, even desirable. (I am sorry, Ben, I had to say it!). 

The games' rules can be downloaded form game's official website: Of course you can also contact Ben there, discuss the game with him, and even buy it!